Print

Union Council (21st October 2013)

Minutes

Switch to Agenda

Name of Committee Union Council
Date and time 21st October 2013, 18:00
Place
Policy Ideas
1. Managing External speakers
2. Union Council dates, times & locations
3. Activities and presence at sites
4. Payday Lenders
Formal Business
5. Welcome and apologies for absence

The Chair welcomed everyone to the first Union Council of the year, and mentioned her desire for both the business of the meeting to run to time, and for the meetings to take place in a cordial atmosphere.

She asked that, to save time, clapping be deferred until the end, and requested that Twitter should be used in a polite and respectful manner, and only to say things that people would say out loud in the meeting. She also reminded attendees that if they had any questions at all to just ask, and that no question was too daft, and asked those with experience at Union Council to help those who were new.

6. Minutes of the previous meeting

The minutes of the previous meeting held on 8 May 2013 were approved (Yes: 37, No: 2, with 2 abstentions) by a counted vote.

7. Matters arising from the previous meetings

There were no matters arising since the previous meeting.

Membership & Financial
8. Membership matters

(a) Close of nominations for Open Place Union Councillors, speeches and opening of voting

The Chair explained the process for electing the ten Open Place Union Councillors and the candidates gave their speeches. The candidates were: Mayan Al-Shakarchy, Chloe Asker, Alexander Brockman, William Cable, Cheyney Cartwright, Samuel Halfhead, Matthew Hawksworth, Katie Lightowler, Chris McGeehan, Darren Richardson, Samrand Salih and James Wilson.  Voting opened electronically and the other elections were held while voting took place.

(b) Election of student representatives on University Committees

The following student representatives were elected to University committees:

Senate: There were three positions and three candidates, all of whom were duly elected.

  • Katherine Spires
  • David Gunns
  • Grace Cameron

Court: There were eight positions and eight candidates, all of whom were duly elected.

  • Joel Young
  • Katy Elliot
  • Marcus Burton
  • Gabriella Discenza
  • Roberto Gregoratti
  • Vlad Novikov
  • Shailesh Agarwal
  • Oli Coles

Military Education Committee: There was one position and four candidates, and Leon Rea was duly elected.

  • Henry Pearson: 7 votes
  • Shruti Verma: 2 votes
  • Leon Rea: 24 votes (elected)
  • Lawrence Smith: 5 votes

 (c) Appointment of Sabbatical Officers to Zone Committees

The following appointments of additional sabbatical officer to sit on the zone committees were made en bloc by a clear show of hands:

Creative Industries Zone: VP Education; Democracy Zone: VP Sports Development; Sustainability Zone: VP Student Communities; Student Communities Zone: VP Welfare; Student Life Zone: VP Engagement; Sports Development Zone: VP Student Communities; External Engagement Zone: VP Sports Development; Education Zone: VP Democracy and Creative Industries.

(d) Student representatives pool for Disciplinary Committee

It was explained that members of Union Council will be selected at random as and when required from a list of Union Council members to sit on this Committee. Members wishing to opt out were asked to write their name and “OPT OUT” on their voting cards and hand them in at the end of the meeting.

 

v  At 7:30pm, the meeting adjourned for an access break, and continued at 7:40pm.

 

 (e) Close of voting for Open Place Union Councillors and announcement of results

The following candidates were elected and immediately welcomed to join the meeting:

  • Cheyney Cartwright
  • James Wilson
  • Katie Lightowler
  • Matthew Hawksworth
  • Mayan Al-Shakarchy
  • Samrand Salih
  • Samuel Halfhead
  • William Cable

(f) Election of Union Council representatives to Zone Committees

  • Democracy Zone Committee

There were two positions and six candidates. The election was conducted in two rounds and the folowing were elected: Jamie Barker (was elected in round one); Mayan Al-Shakarchy (in round two).

Round one

Jamie Barker: 14 votes (elected)

Henry Pearson: 5 votes

Laura Ellis: 8 votes

William Cable: 7 votes

Mayan Al-Shakarchy: 11 votes

Thomas Feather: 3 votes

Round two

Henry Pearson: 9 votes

Laura Ellis: 8 votes

William Cable: 8 votes

Mayan Al-Shakarchy: 18 votes (elected)

Thomas Feather: 6 votes

  • Sustainability Zone Committee

There were two positions and two candidates, both of whom were duly elected: Gabriella Discenza and Jessica Lobo

  • Student Communities Zone Committee

There were two positions and two candidates, both of whom were duly elected: Roberto Gregoratti and Samrand Salih

  • Creative Industries Zone Committee

There were two positions and one candidate, who was duly elected: Jamie Hemingway

  • Education Zone Committee

There were two positions and two candidates, both of whom were duly elected: Katherine Spires and William Cable

  • External Engagement Zone Committee

There were two positions and two candidates, both of whom were duly elected: Josh Cox and Joel Young

  • Sports Development Zone Committee

There were two positions and three candidates. The election was conducted in two rounds and the following were elected: Alex Hovden (elected in round 1) and Katie Lightowler (elected in round 2)

Round one

Alex Hovden: 29 votes

Katie Lightowler: 9 votes

Sam Halfhead: 12 votes

Round two

Sam Halfhead: 20 votes

Katie Lightowler: 23 votes

  • Student Life Zone Committee

There were two positions and one candidate, who was duly elected: Gabriella Discenza

9. Financial matters

(a) Approval of Financial Schedule
David Gilani explained that the Financial Schedule is a document that sets which bodies and individuals can authorise different levels of expenditure and other financial commitment, and to ensure proper scrutiny can happen. He explained that this year there are a few changes, including general rises in line with inflation, and others to help officers and staff make decisions for a number of years.

Joel Young asked, in relation to the limits under “Purchase of goods for resale”, whether single orders could just be split to avoid the cost limit? David replied that there will always be hypothetical ways to get around any system, but that we trust our staff to not do this. He also explained that the limit was also there to protect staff, by not expecting them to make larger decisions than they should be making.

David Gunns asked if the new limit of £5,000 on events will stop JCRs from holding events over that price. David Gilani replied that the new expenditure limit is actually £7,500 and that expenditure at that level will now go to Student Communities Zone Committee for approval.

Samuel Halfhead asked if expenditure by Bars comes under the Events category. David replied that in most cases that expenditure would be approved by the Commercial Sub-committee or departmental managers. The Graduation Ball was approved by Finance Sub-Committee. Samuel asked for clarification on Halls Bars, and David said that most of their events don’t hit the upper limit, but the system was designed to catch those that do.

David Gunns asked if events costing more than £7,500 would now go to Trustee Board. Jaki Booth explained, at the request of the President, that the previous year’s limit was £5,000, so it has been increased. Over this limit, it used to say relevant committee, now says zone committee. It was pointed out that in line K (Events generating revenue or costs), the entries for £7,500 should be in the first two columns, and not the third.

The Financial Schedule was approved as amended by a clear show of hands.

 (b) Approval of expenditure: 3 year insurance proposal

David Gilani explained that a long-term insurance deal was more competitive but as it goes across years it will cost more now, so needs to come to Union Council to approve, and that we usually only do one or two year deals. However, the Union believed that this deal was so good, they decided to go for three years.

Joel Young asked how likely it was that we would receive the 5% rebate. Jaki Booth (Chief Executive, who spoke with the leave of the meeting) said she believed that SUSU has always received it in the past, so it was very likely.

The expenditure was approved by a clear show of hands.

 

Policy
10. Feedback from today's session

Payday lenders – Josh Cox

The majority of members agreed that banning advertising from payday lenders was desirable. Members also agreed that advertising was a valuable source of monetary income for SUSU, but that further clarification of rules surrounding advertising in SUSU was desirable in the next Student Life Zone meeting. It was also agreed that it would be desirable for SUSU to lobby the City Council about banning payday lenders from advertising around the city. It was note that this matter would be referred to the Student Life Zone and recommended that a payday lenders/finance working group be set up. Josh added that if anyone would like to be involved in this working group, they should contact him after the meeting.

Action: A working group to be setup via Student Life Zone, the Zone to discuss the rules surrounding advertising in SUSU, and the Zone to bring a policy on payday lenders to the next meeting of Union Council.

Activities and Presence at sites – Gabriela Discenza

Gabriela expressed an interest in setting up a student committee in Winchester that would take over responsibilities of organising events in Winchester. After discussion, it was decided that perhaps this would not be the best option. VP Student Communities has a project in mind for the future involving setting up community forums across campuses which may fulfil the same purpose as the proposed Student Committee. Regarding other sites, as a result of student feedback, Gabriela felt that MedSoc based at the Southampton General Hospital should be represented better at SUSU so that they remain more involved in what is going on within the organisation.

Action: Oli Coles to work on setting up community forums across sites.

Managing External Speakers – David Gilani

After discussion, it was agreed that SUSU should not impose principled restrictions on external speakers on campus, but that a policy will be created for next council that will clarify and set out specific guidelines to manage them.

Action: David Gilani to come to the next meeting of Union Council with a policy on external speakers.

Union Council dates and times – David Martin

It was decided that Union Councillors require more information about the process of Union Council before the meeting, for example, who decides which ideas make it to Council meetings. Regarding times and dates of future Union Council meetings, the majority agreed that 6pm is a better start time, however staffing issues need to be addressed and will be discussed outside the meeting. To make the meetings more accommodating for some members, meetings may be changed to alternating days and not always held on a Monday evening which has been the case previously.

Action: David Martin to bring the dates and times to the next meeting of Democracy Zone Committee. 

11. Action from previous ideas session

(a) Education Zone Strategy

David Mendoza-Wolfson explained that, with help from previous VP Academic Affairs, he has re-written the Education Zone strategy in line with recommendations from the previous ideas session.

(b) Leadership and Representation (1213P16)

David Martin updated the Council about the steps being taken regarding the gender balancing policy passed at the last meeting. The changes will come into effect in time for the next elections in January for Union Councillors.

 

12. Policy proposals

There were none received.

Accountability
13. Zone reports and updates

(a) Zone Strategies

The Sabbatical Officers presented the strategies from their respective Zones. Oli Coles presented the Sustainability Zone strategy on behalf of Beckie Thomas.

The strategies were approved en bloc, by a clear show of hands.

(b) Democracy Zone: Policy Review Group update

Marcus Burton updated the Council on the work of the Policy Review Group. He explained that they were looking into re-classifying policies into zones or the Trustee Board and making decisions on whether to keep, lapse, consolidate or amend policies. In the next group of Zone meetings, committees will get to have a say on their relevant policies. Changes would then be brought to the first Union Council of 2014.

 

14. Officer plans 2013-2014

The Sabbatical Officers presented their plans for the year, including goals and measureable outcomes. Claire Gilbert spoke on behalf of Beckie Thomas.

Anjelica Finnegan asked Oli Coles a question regarding SUSU’s involvement with the research community at the University. As there are several matters concerning the local community (e.g. housing, volunteering) that overlap with research carried out in the Social Sciences department, have they considered engaging more with then researchers? Oli Coles explained that this has not happened yet, but is a future goal.

 

15. Officer reports and questions

The officer reports were received by Council. Corrections were made to the attendance sheet: David Heard (Student Trustee) has attended all Commercial Sub Committees to date, and his attendance has been corrected in the database.

(a) Officer reports

Oli Coles asked for feedback about the style of his report, and also mentioned that JCR elections had opened, and asked for people to nominate themselves and spread the word.

Claire Gilbert, on behalf of Beckie Thomas, pointed out that her report was not complete yet, but mentioned that the peer support scheme is progressing and volunteers are being trained, and that the BEES (Business Ethics and Environmental Students) is progressing as well.

Claire Gilbert, for her own portfolio, said that she had been focusing on change this year, and explained why her manifesto and report differ slightly, as her work has become more focused.

David Gilani mentioned his work on the “student centred university” which involves unlocking student funding, and asked for ideas from all members for projects that can benefit from funding. He said that Pulse has had low attendance despite having been led by a specific student project , and that therefore Pulse is no more, and there will be different events each week instead of having a specific club night each Friday. On eradicating student poverty – he was working on targeting international fees, providing better access to bursaries and alleviating financial concerns. There will be projects throughout the year.  A number of questions followed for David:

Sam Everard asked, for the radio station, if an official announcement about Pulse will be sent out. DG replied that a press statement would be sent out.

Grace Cameron asked if the change was immediate. DG confirmed that it was, to avoid losing any more money on the event, which could be put to better use for students. Grace asked if the bar managers knew this, and DG confirmed that they do from this morning.

Katherine Spires said that the fonts and styles in the officer reports are inaccessible for students with disabilities. DG promised that changes will be made for the future reports.

Josh Cox asked if there will still be a student committee in charge of events. DG replied that special events will definitely feature student input.

Joel Young asked if anything is going to be done about those whose hours are cut, who have 3 hours notice, specifically in case of crew. DG replied that they would find hours across the term, and it is obviously unfortunate if events are cancelled during the term.

Alex Hovden asked if there will still be the option for the Union to have a nightclub. DG said yes, for example Freshers was successful, and that some events do work, but that it was not as good as a regular nightclub.

Joe Spencer asked if there was a financial plan for the money that would have been spent on Pulse DG said that they had not had too much riding on Pulse, and that it had been sensible spending on it to see if it would be successful. Joe Spencer also asked if students who had bought Pulse VIP tickets or the Masterpass would be disadvantaged. DG responded that no students have been disadvantaged by cancelling Pulse.

David Martin mentioned the opening of funding round for student groups, the creation of a cultural quarter in Southampton and improved facility access.

David Mendoza-Wolfson mentioned his work on representation and course rep elections. He was also working on improving timetabling, international fees, an audit group. He also mentioned work done on ‘outside the lecture’ activity, including library improvements.

Alex Hovden asked how far along plans to introduce a 24-hour library are. David said has spoken to the new librarian, and that he did not have any progress to report that this stage, but hoped to be able to report progress at future Union Council meetings.

Evan Whyte suggested that members ask him if they wanted more information on the work he has done, and gave some achievements so far.

Samuel Halfhead asked if, in relation to the new kit providers, teams who have recently bought kit would need to buy new kit? Evan said there would be more access to funding for kit.

(b) Questions to Officers

Q1. David Martin said this was a useful question and one that is important to have a clear process on. For Student groups, there is a specific ‘How-to’ guide on ‘How to increase disabled members participation in your group’. If a member wished to make a complaint, groups@susu.org would be the contact to email (or pres@susu.org) to complain or report an incident. The incident would be confidentially dealt with by them. It is not clear what the implications would be. It is likely that, if warranted that the group/individual in question would be referred to the Disciplinary Committee and dealt with based on the severity of the offence.

Q2a David said he expected an explanation of the facilities charges to be available from February 1st, but that it was difficult to look at past costs of all individual student groups as there is no centralised source which makes dissecting the information difficult. This relates mainly to hiring of technology.

Q2b David said he hoped this would be done by the end of the academic year. This again is a difficult issue because prices vary hugely dependent on the size of the event, the staging and the number of crew needed. He hopped to have a ‘crib sheet’written up specifically about tech but this can only serve as a guideline, however it will hopefully add some clarity.

Q3 David Gilani answered in place of Oli Coles. He said that it was inevitable that things will slip through the net during a busy period, but that this was no excuse. He promised to improve communication for future events. Jack Bridgen asked a question about Freshers’ reps, to which David Gunns responded.

Q4 David said he wanted to keep his answer brief, and summarised that there had been some miscommunication, and that there had been a number of issues arising from the conflict between being student officer and staff member. 

Alex Shepherd pressed David for an answer to part 1 of the question (as to whether the student would have been able to run in the Autumn Elections), to which David responded that he would not have been so able.

Alex Hovden asked if a summary of the response could be posted on the relevant Facebook groups. David said that it could be.

 

Other business
16. Union Council Stars

For their work on the open Days, the following were Highly Commended: Grace Cameron, Aaron Wigglesworth, Catherine Darcy, Josh Cox, Adam Proudley and Jamie Hemmingway.

Two Union Council Stars were awarded, to David Gunns for his work with JCRs and to Alex Shepherd for his work on the Freshers Facebook group.

 

17. Any other business

(a) A motion to support the lecturers’ industrial action was moved, pursuant to Union Policy 1112P5, as follows:

Resolution on industrial action by lecturers on 31st October 2013

NOTES

1.         Industrial action (a strike) is planned by the University and College Union (lecturers) for 31st October 2013.

2.         Union Policy 1112P5 sets out SUSU’s position on lecturers’ industrial action as:

“That, subject to Union Council approval, we should support our lecturers and UCU in any industrial action that doesn’t have a severe adverse effect on the student experience and that tries to protect the quality of teaching at Southampton University.”

BELIEVES

1.         The industrial action planned by UCU for 31st October 2013 will not “have a severe adverse effect on the student experience” and will “[try] to protect the quality of teaching at Southampton University.”

RESOLVES

1.         SUSU will support the lecturers’ industrial action.

David Gilani outlined the issue. The University and College Union (the lecturers’ trade union) plan to strike on Thursday due to low increases in their pay. DG began with an explanation of Union Policy 1112P5 which sets out SUSU’s position on lecturers’ industrial action.

David Gilani opened debate by arguing that the action will not have severe adverse effects – it is a one day strike, set away from exam times. He said that lecturers are not trying to punish students, and expressed his belief that we need to support our lecturers.

David Mendoza-Wolfson spoke against the motion. He said that the action would have severe effects on students and will not protect the quality of teaching in Southampton. He said had a spreadsheet which showed that there were 1015 contacts (lectures, tutorials etc.) with 18,350 different effects (instances of students being affected).

George Disney raised a Point of Information, saying that the strike will not affect this many people. Anjelica Finnegan attempted to raise a Point of Information, but this was rejected by David Mendoza-Wolfson. He continued, saying that the strike will damage education, and will affect teaching.

David Gunns moved procedural motion A (to give the current speaker an extension) to give David an extension of one minute. This was passed by a clear show of hands. David Mendoza-Wolfson continued, saying that although he was sympathetic to the cause, we should not support the strike as it will damage and hinder our members’ education.

Oli Coles moved procedural motion D (to move the vote), which was passed by a clear show of hands. George enquired as to whether the procedural motion could be blocked, and the Chair confirmed that the main motion had to be put to the vote immediately.

The motion was passed (Yes: 24, No: 22, with 2 abstentions) on a counted vote.

18. Date and time of next meeting

The next meeting is to be held on 2 December 2013, Senate Room, Building 37.

The meeting closed at 9:35pm.   

Key: P (Papers Provided), PF (Papers to Follow)